Dr. Gonzo wrote:He looks more like Bin Laden. They even got the same beard, and everything
If you say so, but i done showed you that the majority of the middle easterners are black.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:Prove that these gropus were in Syria around the time of the paintings.
I can do you one better i can show you how the Prophet Muhammad was white.
"While we were sitting with the Prophet in the mosque, a man came riding on a camel. He made his camel kneel down in the mosque, tied its foreleg and then said: "Who amongst you is Muhammad?" At that time the Prophet was sitting amongst us (his companions) leaning on his arm. We replied, "This white man reclining on his arm." The an then addressed him, "O Son of 'Abdul Muttalib.""
taken from the muslim hadith Volume 1, Book 3, Number 63: Narrated Anas bin Malikhttp://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamental ... 3.sbt.html
lol now you know why its forbidden to show images of muhammad.
Dr. Gonzo wrote: If you go around the world NOT ONE JESUS LOOKS THE SAME!! Like I said before everybody has their own interpretation of what Jesus looked like.
if every body has an interpretation of what jesus looks like then how come their are only white jesus's hanging up on peoples wall's? and how come people of color are the majority of the ones with them?
yeah everybody has a different interpretation of jesus.
if paint a picture of jesus then present it to the world and say this is the face of jesus the proof is in the shroud of turin. that is not my interpretation of what i think jesus looks like that is what i'm telling you what jesus looks like. theres a difference.
i thought you were smarter than that gonzo.
your ass is seriously naive if you don't think white folks tampered with the images of jesus.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:BS!
lol so you know what christianity was called before it was called christianity?
Dr. Gonzo wrote:Why would I? Christians in Japan make up less then 1%.
you laughin but where the mexican jesus at then? everytime i see ya'll dippin in your lows ya'll got a white man on the hood and ya'll runnin round with the name jesus more than any other race i know. lol so where's the mexican interpretation. matter of fact why you got a picture of white jesus if you think everybody has different interpretations of jesus?
you probably like the rest of these dam christians saying "jesus is what color you want him to be" if that's the case then why do you always see him as white?
Dr. Gonzo wrote:LOL
Since when is this debate about the first humans?
Again find DNA tests that show that most Hebrews/Jews/Israelis have Black African blood instead of desperately resorting to the Out-of-Africa theory
I already showed you the proof, if the jewish cohen gene is significantly higher in black jews doesn't that mean that the cohen gene is originally a black gene? tell me how could the gene be higher in black jews if it is a white gene?
i do believe higher means it occurs more in one than the other.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:Why can't you answer simple questions? Where are the Black Olmec ancestors in Mexico??? Where are their remains??? Yeah, and what a convenience excuse to use "they vanished".
there has been numerous skeletons found in the americas (from the north to the south) that are african
Unexpected Faces in Ancient America by Alexander Von Wuthenau
An anthropological study on the origin of Olmecs by A Wiercinski
Departamento de Genetica, Instituto Nacional de la Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico.
We analyze the possible effect of gene flow on the genetic structure of present-day Mexicans. For this purpose we reviewed previous admixture estimates for various Indian and Mestizo groups. Several facts seem clear: (1) There are no pure Indian groups in Mexico, because all Indian groups show variable degrees of admixture, mostly with whites (range, 0.088 in the Huichol to 0.373 in the Huasteco); (2) the main ancestral contribution to the noncoastal lower middle class Mestizo populations is Indian (above 50%) so that from a genetic standpoint Indians and lower middle class Mestizos are not much different; and (3) black ancestry is quite high on the coasts, ranging from 0.127 to 0.405 on the east coast, and is present in other Mestizos, ranging in large urban centers from 0.027 in Oaxaca to 0.107 in Puebla and in smaller cities from 0.08 in Tlaxcala to 0.181 in Cuanalan.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/quer ... t=Abstract
The following percentages of African ancestry were found among East coast populations:
Paraiso - 21.7%
El Carmen - 28.4%
Veracruz - 25.6%
Saladero - 30.2%
Tamiahua - 40.5%
Among Indian groups, the Chontal have 5% and the Cora .8% African
admixture. According to Crawford et al., the mestizo population
of Saltillo has 15.8% African ancestry, while Tlaxcala has 8% and
The Olmecs built their civilization in the region of the current states of Veracruz and Tabasco. Now here again are the percentages of African ancestry according to Lisker et al.:
Paraiso - 21.7%
El Carmen - 28.4%
Veracruz - 25.6%
Saladero - 30.2%
Tamiahua - 40.5%
Paraiso is in Tabasco and Veracruz is, of course, in the state of Veracruz. Tamiahua is in northern Veracruz.
all of this information is found in
Genetic structure of autochthonous populations of Meso-America: Mexico by Ruben Lisker
you just gone keep denying shit huh? i guess its okay to steal black culture it's just not okay to be black.
i don't know why you people go around stealing black culture, blacks don't go around stealing ya'll culture.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:
Did you ven bother to read your own link?
We have analyzed and compared mitochondrial DNA variation of populations from the Near East and Africa and found a very high frequency of African lineages present in the Yemen Hadramawt: more than a third were of clear sub-Saharan origin. Other Arab populations carried ∼10% lineages of sub-Saharan origin
What a surprise Yemen which is in Africa had alot of African lineages present while non-African Arab countries ONLY HAD 10%.
You would think it would be more since the Arabs really loved to sell, and exploit poor African women
yemen is not in africa.
"Underhill et al., 2001 showed that African Y chromosome haplotypes are present in significant fraction of the Middle Eastern population. See Figure UNDERHILL. This study did not specifically address Jewish populations but many contemporary Jewish populations including the Ashkenazim have been traced to a common Middle Eastern source population existing several thousand years ago (Hammer et al., 2002, Nebel et al. 2001, Thomas et al., 2002). So, by extrapolation, we would expect similar frequencies of African Y-chromosome haplotypes in Jews as we see for Middle Easterners
Indeed, Baher et al., 2004 showed that the E Y-chromosome haplotype is found not infrequently in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. The E haplotype is also commonly found in Africa.
Baher et al., 2004 showed that the mtDNA haplotypes L2, preHV, U7, M1 and U1b constitute a minor (few percent) but significant percentage of mtDNA haplotypes in Jews. These haplotypes appear to have Near Eastern/Mediterranean/African origins.
affiliation results using 300 odd autosomal STR markers and a different algorithm from ours show extensive African affiliation for Middle Easterners (Rosenberg et al, 2003, see Figure ROSENBERG, Middle Eastern Columns for k=4). Since many contemporary Jewish populations including Ashkenazim have been traced to a common Middle Eastern source population existing several thousand years ago (Hammer et al., 2002, Nebel et al. 2001, Thomas et al., 2002), this would suggest that by extrapolation, Jews would harbor similar levels of African affiliation. "http://www.ancestrybydna.com/welcome/pr ... fricanjews
you can keep denying shit if you want to but the proof is in the puddin.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:No they ain't. That's an Olmec mask.
Ooooooooooo...and here is another Olmec mask, and statue.
look brainiac they both olmecs but they two different groups of olmecs. like you got two different groups of mexicans white mexicans and brown mexicans.
Dr. Gonzo wrote:I guess in your warped mind they must not be from the Olmecs since they don't have "negroid features", huh?
naw, i didn't say that, i just don't claim the the non-negro ones.
i only claim the negro ones like this one